So cycle time falls, discount leakage stops, and the forecast is worth reading.
… but true change comes from building simplified end-to-end sales processes, clear roles and a system that brings it to life.
CRM and CPQ programmes are usually run as technology projects: objects, fields, integrations, a go-live date. The sales team inherits admin nobody asked for, the leadership team inherits a forecast nobody believes, and adoption fails.
We work in the other direction. Understand the commercial rhythm the leadership actually want. Define how an opportunity should progress against how customers really buy. Then bridge every process into one coherent end-to-end selling process, however small each piece looks on its own, because the gaps between them are where deals and margin go.
That process has to hold four things at once: what leadership expect, how customers buy, what keeps the business compliant and execution ready, and what a seller can realistically follow in a live deal. Only then do you decide what evidence proves each stage gate and who is accountable for it.
Only then do you turn to the platform: what it has to do, what the requirements are, and what gets built.
The job is not to give sellers what they ask for. It is to make the right way the easiest way.
Process first, data second, system third. Run in that order, the build gets cheaper and adoption stops being a campaign.
Process before platform. We design how the opportunity runs first. The system follows the design.
Built to be inspected. A process nobody can inspect is a suggestion.
Independent of technology. Processes built for any platform, written as clear user stories.
Practitioner led. Designed by people who owned the transformation and the in-life operations.
Process work, brought to life in an ecosystem.
This is process work first and foremost. Every stage, every gate, every handover and every field exists for a reason: to capture the data the business needs, to drive the behaviour you expect from sellers, and to give the customer an experience that does not fall apart at the seams between teams.
Then it gets built into the technology. And the technology is never one system. It is an ecosystem: CRM, CPQ, contract and billing, forecasting and revenue tools, conversation intelligence, engagement platforms, partner systems and the marketing interlock. Each owns a piece, each has to hand off cleanly, and a design that ignores that produces integration debt within a year.
AI sits inside that ecosystem rather than on top of it. It is only as good as the process that feeds it and the data that process reliably produces. Get the sequence wrong and AI accelerates the mess instead of removing it.
Designed as process. Delivered as an ecosystem. Easy enough that a seller uses it without being chased.
Why it matters
of a seller’s time goes on activity that generates no revenue. Most of that is process, not selling.
of the working week is spent actually selling. The rest is admin, systems and rework.
more revenue growth for the top quartile of AI adopters against the median. Clean process and data are what separate them.
improvement in sales ROI where AI is invested in properly, on a foundation that can carry it.
The most common cause of disappointment in these programmes is documented and consistent: buying the technology before defining the problem.
Sources: Accenture; Salesforce State of Sales 2026; McKinsey & Company AI in B2B sales research.
Eight areas, from first touch to cash collected.
The core selling process, the peripheral processes around it, and the technology that carries both. Which go deep depends on where the engine is actually failing.
Sales process design
The opportunity lifecycle stage by stage, defined by buyer progress. Entry and exit criteria a manager can inspect in minutes, deal review that surfaces slippage early, and handovers that keep the deal context intact.
Qualification framework fit
MEDDPICC, BANT or value based, selected against deal size, cycle length and seller capability, then configured. One framework applied consistently is worth more than three taught and none enforced.
Roles, RACI and handoffs
Every step tied to a role. Who owns it, who is consulted, who is accountable, and what has to travel across each handover intact. The artefact most transformations skip and later wish they had.
Lead to opportunity
Lead definitions and scoring, routing and assignment, response service levels, and conversion accountability agreed between marketing, SDR and field. The handover most funnels lose volume in.
Quote to cash and governance
Price book, configuration and bundling rules, the discount and approval ladder, deal desk, contract lifecycle and the handover into order and billing. Where margin quietly disappears.
Forecasting and rhythm
Commit, upside and best case defined and evidenced. Coverage ratios by segment, and the forecast, pipeline, deal and business review sequence, with what each is for and what leaves the room as a decision.
The processes around the sale
Renewals and expansion, commissions interlock, territory and quota administration, sale to delivery handover, win-loss review, and compliance sequenced in parallel rather than at signature. Owned by others, rarely designed together.
Ecosystem and data design
What each platform owns, what integrates, where AI earns a place, and the data model underneath: hierarchies, taxonomies and agreed metric definitions. We write the requirements. The SIs build.
Process design first. The platform is told what to do, not asked.
We design the process and write the requirements. Your team or your implementation partner builds it. We stay close enough to make sure what gets built is what was designed.
Map what actually happens
The lifecycle as it runs, not as it is documented. Where deals stall, where margin leaks, and every workaround people have built.
Design the target process
Stages by buyer progress. Entry and exit criteria, the qualification standard, and who is accountable at each gate.
Map roles, RACI and handoffs
Every step tied to a role. Who owns it, who is consulted, and what has to travel across each handover intact.
Define the data model
What the process has to produce. Hierarchies, taxonomies, and agreed definitions of pipeline, stage and win rate.
Write the system requirements
What each platform has to do, what integrates, and where AI earns a place. Handed to whoever builds it, ready to work from.
Govern the build and hand over
We stay close through the build and the pilot so what ships matches the design. Then the cadence, the coaching questions and the ownership pass to your team.


A revenue engine your managers can inspect and your team can run.
Most consultancies leave you with a deck and a target operating model. Four things you can actually operate from the week we finish.
A process people actually follow
Stages defined by buyer progress, evidence at every gate, and handovers that hold. Reps use it because it is the easiest way to work, not because it is mandated.
A forecast worth reading
Commit, upside and best case defined and evidenced, coverage ratios that mean something, and a number that holds inside a range the board can plan against.
Margin you can see and govern
A discount curve that is visible, an approval ladder set against deal risk, quotes out the same day and clean orders into finance. Leakage stops being invisible.
A stack that fits the process
An ecosystem where each platform owns a defined piece, the data model holds, AI has somewhere useful to sit, and the licence cost is visible.
Cycle time, stage conversion, forecast accuracy, discount discipline, cost of sale and adoption. Baselined before we start, reported again when we finish.
In practice
Multinational B2B business, three regions.
As-is
Three regions, three ways of working
To-be
One process, lead to cash, every peripheral in it
Into the systems
We designed and governed. The SIs built.
Requirements written from the design, then implemented alongside the systems integrators.
The outcome
One process, one qualification standard, one data spine, across three regions.
An ecosystem integrated by design rather than accumulated by procurement, with each platform owning a defined part of the process. Improvement in forecast accuracy, pipeline coverage and opportunity discipline, and a rhythm of business running on data the process reliably produces.
Process is the floor everything else stands on.
A strategy cannot be executed on a broken process, and a play cannot be measured through one. These are the parts either side of it.
Strategy and go-to-market
Segmentation, coverage and routes to market. The design this process exists to execute.
Explore ›Plays and pipeline
What actually runs through the process. The value story, the plays, and the pipeline they generate.
Explore ›Learning and academy
Onboarding, ramp and certification. A new process needs the capability to run it, not just a launch email.
Explore ›Organisation and people
Structure, spans, roles and job families. The RACI only holds if the roles behind it are real.
Explore ›Sales kick-offs
Where a new process meets the whole field at once. Usually the moment it either lands or does not.
Explore ›The Diagnostic
Establishes whether process is genuinely the constraint, or whether something upstream is doing the damage.
Explore ›
It starts with a conversation about where deals stall, where margin goes and which numbers you do not currently trust.
Copyright © Compose Sales Partners Limited. COMPOSE Sales Partners, the Compose Sales Partners logos, COMPOSE Sales Model is a trademark and service mark of COMPOSE Sales Partners Limited. PERFORM, PACE, and RISE are proprietary frameworks of COMPOSE Sales Partners. Other brands and product names are the trademarks of their respective companies.

The challenge
An award-winning commercial enablement function had to be designed and built from the ground up, covering plays, academy, content, engagement, and the platform that runs them. The bar was set high. It had to be measurable, evidenced, and connected to revenue outcomes, not a content library.
What was done
· Designed and led the full commercial enablement function as the accountable VP. Owned the operating model and all four Centres of Excellence (Plays and Pipeline Creation, Academy, Content, Engagement).
· Built the three-tier sales play system from Anchor Value Story through Core Value Propositions to Tactical Plays, with bill of materials and activation.
· Built the Pipeline Creation engine. Cadenced prospecting, marketing-sales-product-inside-sales interlock, pipeline coverage as the managed outcome.
· Built the Academy across Foundations (Ready to Sell), Skills by role, and the Leadership Academy with a proprietary hiring framework.
· Architected the content discipline (hero/L1/L2/L3 tiering, governance, decay management).
· Selected and led implementation of the enablement platform. Designed the engagement model (manager rhythms, deal coaching, flagship events) with a single voice across all of it.
Outcome
Internal Innovation Award for the function and approach. Pipeline coverage uplift of 1.7x to 3.2x off a €6.5 million sales kick-off event spanning 1,650 people. Material improvement in onboarding-to-productivity time. Play adoption and content engagement evidenced at function level. A manager layer enabled to coach deals rather than chase forecasts.

The challenge
The corporate sales function needed a new strategy and a partner programme designed to extend reach into segments the direct organisation could not cover economically. The existing partner motion was disconnected from the direct go-to-market, with overlapping accounts, unclear economics, and inconsistent value propositions.
What was done
· Designed the corporate sales strategy. Segmentation, coverage, channel mix.
· Designed and operationalised the partner programme. Tiering, enablement, deal registration, partner business plans, economics.
· Aligned partner and direct motions to remove conflict and create complementary coverage.
· Led the rhythm of business and reporting that gave leadership confidence in partner-sourced and partner-influenced revenue.
Outcome
Coherent partner programme operating in market with clear economics. Partner-sourced and partner-influenced revenue evidenced through structured reporting. Direct and indirect motions complementary rather than competing.

The challenge
Following a major acquisition, two commercial organisations had to be integrated into one without losing the run-rate. Operating models, processes, tools, plays, and ways of working were duplicative, inconsistent, and slowing the combined organisation down. Sellers were navigating two systems and two cultures.
What was done
· Designed the unified commercial operating model post-merger. Segmentation, coverage, organisation design, role architecture, decision rights, governance.
· Designed the unified enablement function using the PACE framework. Single plays system, single Academy, single content discipline, single engagement model.
· Led the lead-to-cash process rationalisation and the supporting architecture decisions.
· Built the rhythm of business and forecast discipline that gave the combined organisation a single source of truth.
· Mobilised the cultural integration alongside the structural one. Recognition, communications, manager activation.
Outcome
Combined commercial organisation operating as one inside the integration window. Orders growth of +2.4 percent representing $6.7 million across more than 2,000 sellers. Sellers operating on a single set of plays, content, and processes across the combined business. Internal Transformation Award.

The challenge
Following a major acquisition, two commercial organisations had to be integrated into one without losing the run-rate. Operating models, processes, tools, plays, and ways of working were duplicative, inconsistent, and slowing the combined organisation down. Sellers were navigating two systems and two cultures.
What was done
· Designed the unified commercial operating model post-merger. Segmentation, coverage, organisation design, role architecture, decision rights, governance.
· Designed the unified enablement function using the PACE framework. Single plays system, single Academy, single content discipline, single engagement model.
· Led the lead-to-cash process rationalisation and the supporting architecture decisions.
· Built the rhythm of business and forecast discipline that gave the combined organisation a single source of truth.
· Mobilised the cultural integration alongside the structural one. Recognition, communications, manager activation.
Outcome
Combined commercial organisation operating as one inside the integration window. Orders growth of +2.4 percent representing $6.7 million across more than 2,000 sellers. Sellers operating on a single set of plays, content, and processes across the combined business. Internal Transformation Award.

The challenge
A multinational B2B business needed to reset enterprise GTM following years of inorganic growth. Coverage was inconsistent across regions, segmentation lacked discipline, the operating model was federated by accident rather than design, and the data architecture beneath the commercial engine had visibility gaps that made forecast and planning untrustworthy.
What was done
· Ran a structured organisational capability assessment across the commercial organisation. The forerunner of the COMPOSE Sales Model Diagnostic™.
· Designed the enterprise GTM strategy and the operating model that supported it. Segmentation, coverage, account tiering, rhythm of business.
· Architected the data and reporting backbone for executive visibility and forecast discipline.
· Led the cross-functional alignment between sales, marketing, product, and finance behind a single plan.
· Mobilised the change across regions, respecting local market nuance while holding a consistent global standard.
Outcome
Revenue scope of £800 million to £1.2 billion across post-merger commercial integration. Material improvement in coverage quality, segmentation discipline, forecast accuracy, and pipeline coverage. Operating model and rhythm of business embedded across all three regions.